Phase transition: Review Configuration → Review Process/Individual Reviews
The System Description 3.5.1 Stakeholder usecase 1 discusses access to past disposition letters and conflicts. Is that assessed by an automatic system or via the self declaration? Does it cut their access to the past reviews only or this proposal too?
STT-884
-
Getting issue details...
STATUS
STT-882
-
Getting issue details...
STATUS
STT-881
-
Getting issue details...
STATUS
SRP Chair
STT-871
-
Getting issue details...
STATUS
STT-887
-
Getting issue details...
STATUS
SRP Member
STT-875
-
Getting issue details...
STATUS
STT-888
-
Getting issue details...
STATUS
The System Description implies that a user must select either Conflict or Available per proposal. Is this the behavior we want?
STT-885
-
Getting issue details...
STATUS
STT-877
-
Getting issue details...
STATUS
STT-876
-
Getting issue details...
STATUS
STT-878
-
Getting issue details...
STATUS
If Review Type is None, what is Review State?
STT-873
-
Getting issue details...
STATUS
STT-879
-
Getting issue details...
STATUS
STT-910
-
Getting issue details...
STATUS
STT-911
-
Getting issue details...
STATUS
STT-905
-
Getting issue details...
STATUS
STT-908
-
Getting issue details...
STATUS
STT-909
-
Getting issue details...
STATUS
Other prompts for the consensus review comments?
STT-903
-
Getting issue details...
STATUS
TTA Member
STT-898
-
Getting issue details...
STATUS
What are the permissions to a reviewer with a Conflict State of Unknown?
STT-886
-
Getting issue details...
STATUS
STT-872
-
Getting issue details...
STATUS
STT-907
-
Getting issue details...
STATUS
Feasibility Reviewer
STT-892
-
Getting issue details...
STATUS
STT-893
-
Getting issue details...
STATUS
Phase Transition: Individual Reviews → Consensus Reviews
Dana, what information do you want to see in an interface at this stage?
STT-933
-
Getting issue details...
STATUS
