You are viewing an old version of this page. View the current version.

Compare with Current View Page History

« Previous Version 79 Next »

Page for tracking an apparently slow down w.r.t CASA-5 and CASA-6 for VLASS calibration: https://open-jira.nrao.edu/browse/PIPE-568

Comparing CASA-5 and CASA-6 (casa-pipeline-validation-8) across the two different CPUs available for batch processing in NM and CV shows that the newer CPUs (E5-2640v3) run a small calibration job (6.7GB) about 1.25 times faster than the old CPUs (E5-2670) with CASA-6 performing slower in every case.  There was no significant run-time difference between NM and CV for similar hardware and software.  Results are in minutes.

Here is the full pipeline script I have used for all of these tests casa_pipescript.py For some tests, I commented out all but hifv_importdata.

Full, serial pipeline with small dataset

RHEL7 - 6.7GB dataset with NM Lustre-2.5.5 (results are in minutes)

CASAnmpost051 (E5-2640v3)cvpost020 (E5-2640v3)nmpost038 (E5-2670)cvpost003 (E5-2670)
5114, 117110, 111144, 143140, 141
6156*, 164*156*, 158*200*, 201*197*, 199*


RHEL7 - 6.7GB dataset after NM upgrade Lustre-2.10.8 and CV results copied from last test (results are in minutes)

CASANM (E5-2640v3)CV (E5-2640v3)NM (E5-2670)CV (E5-2670)
5113, 110110, 111142, 141140, 141
6155*156*, 158*198*197*, 199*

Mar. 3, 2020 krowe: I tried the nmpost051-casa6-rhel7 with the latest casa-pipeline-validation-17.  The run-time was the same as were the tclean() errors.

"*" Means it completed with tclean() errors


Full, new, serial pipeline with small dataset

Mar. 17, 2020 I started using the same pipeline script that Brian is currently using.

RHEL7 - 6.7GB dataset with NM Lustre-2.10.x (results are in minutes)  I testing a CASA-6 job with and without cf.validate_parameters = False and both jobs took the same amount of time +/- 1 minute.

"*" Means "SEVERE pipeline.hifv.tasks.flagging No flag summary statistics"


Full, new, serial pipeline with large dataset

Mar. 17, 2020 I started using the same pipeline script that Brian is currently using.

RHEL7 - 350GB dataset with NM Lustre-2.10.x, CASA-pipeline-5.6.3-9 or CASA 6.0.0.23a100.dev17 (results are in minutes)

CASANM (E5-2640v3)CV (E5-2640v3)NM (E5-2670)CV (E5-2670)
53,350*^3,362*^4,605*^4,480*^
64,016*3,943*5,671*5,253*

"*" Means "SEVERE pipeline.hifv.tasks.flagging No flag summary statistics"

"^" Means "SEVERE setjy No rows were selected"


Full, new, serial pipeline with large dataset and profiling metrics

Mar. 17, 2020 I started using the same pipeline script that Brian is currently using.

RHEL7 - 350GB dataset with NM Lustre-2.10.x, CASA-pipeline-5.6.3-9 or CASA 6.0.0.23a100.dev17 (results are in minutes)

"*" Means "SEVERE pipeline.hifv.tasks.flagging No flag summary statistics"

"^" Means "SEVERE setjy No rows were selected"


Full, new serial pipeline with large dataset and times per pipeline task

Comparing two profiling jobs against one of Brian's jobs (/lustre/aoc/sciops/bkent/pipetest/llama3/workingtest60_2) on the same hardware (E5-2670) in NM.  Times were calculated from the CASA logs.  Times are in minutes.

Large dataset (350GB) times are in minutesCASA-5.6.3-9, PIPELINE 5.6.3-96.0.0.23-pipeline-validation-17, Pipeline master-v0.1-145-ge322387-dirtyCASA-6.0.0.23-pipeline-validation-17, Pipeline master-v0.1-18-g2de4d78-dirty
Taskkent2-pr-c5-l-70kent2-pr-c6-l-70CASA-6 Bkent
hifv_importdata247425392
hifv_hanning175188460
hifv_flagdata272323452
hifv_vlasetjy75199357
hifv_priorcals254281494
hifv_testBPdcals7484123
hifv_flagbaddef010
hifv_checkflag687069
hifv_semiFinalBPdcals75153154
hifv_checkflag189254253
hifv_solint6689105
hifv_fluxboot2104181175
hifv_finalcals162182177
hifv_circfeedpolcal313332
hifv_flagcal010
hifv_applycals205212437
hifv_checkflag174118402930
hifv_statwt645710500
hifv_plotsummary101346350




TOTAL (minutes)448455737460


  • No labels