- Date: //date
- Time: 9:00 ET
- Location: nraozoom04
- Sprint Calendar
Agenda:
- External Review check in
- ISR Feedback
Jira server DMS JIRA columnIds issuekey,summary,issuetype,created,updated,duedate,assignee,reporter,priority,status,resolution columns key,summary,type,created,updated,due,assignee,reporter,priority,status,resolution serverId eb2e750b-a83a-387e-8345-36eee8a98f01 key STT-1583 - Generally dislike having to actively select Available for each proposal.
- Gems
- "I expected to be asked to sign a confidentially declaration before being allowed to even see proposal titles."
- Overall, ISR implemented is well liked with some re-occuring comments
- Rank over Score focus
- More detail in proposals (showing facilities; will come naturally with better proposals i suspect)
- Download proposal option (in requirements)
- SRP Chair thought it was well executed (though wants a download option for role assignment still)
- prefilled text in ISR comments "strengths, weaknesses"
- State of v0.2.1 work
- Thesis Plans under Dual Anonymous
- State of Scheduler Tools preparation (v0.2.2+)
- Introducing Allocation Versions
- General thoughts so far:
- Algorithmic modification with Observation Planner is a Science Target List action that will overwrite all OSDs in an Allocation Disposition
- Give scheduler access to Observation Planner algorithms and the Calibration and Scheduling Strategies
- Manual modification is at the OSD level and its subset of STs
- always sets the needsManualConstruction flag to True
- Complete manual control of select parameters (will iterate with schedulers to sort of exactly which ones they need)
- Facility Specialization
- Scheduler tools are specialized per facility, which should be natural extension of the Allocation Version requiring a facility.
- Algorithmic modification with Observation Planner is a Science Target List action that will overwrite all OSDs in an Allocation Disposition
- Directors Review overview (Dana)
Open Actions:
| Task report | ||
|---|---|---|
|