- Date: //date
- Time: 9:00 ET
- Location: nraozoom04
- Sprint Calendar
Agenda:
- Discussion: What could an early deployment of Review Process look like
- Review feedback from internal review
- Conceptual points
- Joint proposals - how to differentiate science rankings
- Orient Consensus to Rank - drop SRP Score score frameworkConflict DeclarationsDefault to Available
- Implementation points
- Not allow edits if no role assigned
- Complete/Save differences in ISR vs Consensus
- really disliked the Complete/Save function in ISRs
- Conflict Declarations
- Default to Available
- Push to update (e.g., Consensus page)
- Conceptual points
- External Review Prep
- Reviewers
Craig Heinke, SRP chair
Trey Wenger, SRP member
Justin Spilker, SRP member
Tony Remijan, SRP member
Melodie Kao (UC), SRP member
Betsy Mills (UC), SRP member
- Prep reviewers for the point of the review more - not a polished product yet.
- Plan for more realistic TTA member intervention
- Reviewers
- Sprint Reviews and Stakeholders
- Progress Update (patches to v0.2; v0.2.1 work)
Open Actions:
Task report | ||
---|---|---|
|