Attendance:

Agenda:

  • Discussion: What could an early deployment of Review Process look like
  • Review feedback from internal review
    • Conceptual points
      • Joint proposals - how to differentiate science rankings
      • Orient Consensus to Rank - drop score framework
    • Implementation points
      • Not allow edits if no role assigned
      • Complete/Save differences in ISR vs Consensus
        • really disliked the Complete/Save function in ISRs
      • Conflict Declarations
        • Default to Available
      • Push to update (e.g., Consensus page)
  • External Review Prep
    • Reviewers

      • Craig Heinke, SRP chair

      • Trey Wenger, SRP member

      • Justin Spilker, SRP member

      • Tony Remijan, SRP member

      • Melodie Kao (UC), SRP member

      • Betsy Mills (UC), SRP member

    • Prep reviewers for the point of the review more - not a polished product yet.
    • Plan for more realistic TTA member intervention
  • Sprint Reviews and Stakeholders
  • Progress Update (patches to v0.2; v0.2.1 work)


Open Actions: