Page History

• Date: //date
• Time: 9:00 ET
• Location: nraozoom04 
• Sprint Calendar

Attendance:

• Jeff Kern
• Dana Balser
• Mark Whitehead 
• Allison Costa
• Mark Ferguson 

Agenda:

• Identify TAC Chair/ add TAC member pro tem
  
  • Additional TAC panel configuration with hooks to PPR panel configuration to keep PPR review process distinct from Allocate?
• Design story around v0.2.2
  • Review Process has a standard output called the Proposal Review, which has the scientific merit metric, the comments for PI, etc..
  • (We think) Disposition and Approval Processes need a standard output
    • Proposal Disposition
      
      • (TAC) Comments for PI
      • (TAC) Internal Comments
      • (Super TAC) Comments for PI
      • (Super TAC) Internal Comments
      • Allocation Dispositions
    • OSC and PPR proposal processes share a requirement to have Comments for PI and Internal Comment from the Allocate phase. Only the PPR proposal process defines the super TAC comments.
  • Unless this is part of the "Proposal Summary" defined in 2.1.2.5.2 of the Conceptual Architecture already, though it seems to unnecessarily duplicate data

Open Actions: