Versions Compared

Key

  • This line was added.
  • This line was removed.
  • Formatting was changed.

...

Expand
titleProposal Process with TTA powers

The top two rows show key properties that account for progress or transitions in the process.

The third row illustrates the relationship between a SRP member's workflow and Conflict Declaration.

The fourth row is an example of an ISR's Review State.

The fifth row is an example of a Proposal's Consensus Review State.

The sixth row is the phase of the Proposal Process; the seventh is the sub-phase, if applicable.

The eighth row shows the TTA member's workflow through the Proposal Process. A select set of actions is shown, where a solid purple line indicates the TTA member can perform the action. A dotted black line indicates the action is forbidden.

 A single Feasibility Reviewer's, SRP Chair's, SRP Chair's general tasks are shown in rows nine through ten, respectively.

The bold letters indicate important actions a TTA member, SRP member, or SRP Chair must take to advance the system: (A) a TTA member finalizes the Review Configuration; (B) a SRP member certifies their conflicts; (C) a SRP member finalizes their ISRs; (D) a TTA member initiates Consensus sub-phase on a per panel basis; (E) a SRP member completes the Consensus Reviews; (F) a SRP Chair finalizes Consensus Reviews; (G) a TTA member closes the Review Process phase by generating the NLR Scores.







Proposal Processes: Comparison of Panel Proposal Review (PPR) and Observatory Site Review (OSR)

...