Digital Object Identifiers (DOIs) are becoming the preferred method to link data from the scientific papers that use those data. DOIs are "minted" by trusted 3rd party organizations and provide a persistent identifier to a source of data.
Our aim is to provide DOIs for products in the NRAO archive. The three sets below are the highest priority:
1) For "Collections" - final products from large projects. For example, VLASS or ALFALFA
2) For AUDI images
3) For VLA images (pipelined and user-driven).
Issues for discussion/consideration:
1) granularity - one DOI per FITS image, or per collection?
2) versioning - should we reissue a DOI if a new version of the product is archived?
The AAS Pubs board held a data linking meeting on 8/28/20 - we saw no consensus on the granularity or versioning issues, but some sense that aggregations of data links (DOIs or others) could be assigned a DOI. We also learned that DataCite is the primary issuer of DOIs (https://datacite.org), it is E2000/yr for membership (which can be split by consortia) plus E500 per individual organization, then E0.8 per DOI with bulk prices for >2000 DOIs/yr.
Requirements:
(1) for user-supplied collections based on large projects, one DOI will be issued per collection when it is ingested into the archive. This DOI should be displayed prominently during archive searches, and on the page describing the large project data release, and users encouraged to cite the DOI in papers, along with any journal article describing the dataset. A new DOI will be issued if a new reduction of the bulk of the dataset is supplied, but not in the case of small updates.
(2) for VLASS, several DOIs will be issued based on product collections (Quick Look (per epoch), Single Epoch (per epoch), Cumulative). Again, these should be displayed prominently in archive searches and on the VLASS science website.