You are viewing an old version of this page. View the current version.

Compare with Current View Page History

« Previous Version 8 Current »

Agenda:

  • v0.3 prep check in
  • TTA would like a demo of TTAT sometime in March perhaps


Certification Behavior: Reviewer vs TTA

  • Note, to Certify Conflicts, there can be no Conflict States of Unknown
  • Use case 1:
    • Automatic conflicts are determined. Then, a SRP member declares their conflicts, Certifies conflicts, and then cannot interact with conflict certification again.
    • After the fact, they realize they need to change a Conflict State (either to available or to conflict). They contact (externally) the TTA Member.
  • Use case 2:
    • Automatic conflicts are determined. Then, a SRP member views their conflicts and disagrees with an autoConflict. They do not certify and instead notify the TTA member that the autoConflict should be changed.
  • Option 1:
    • We add a save button that allows the TTA member to update but not certify, as there will be Conflict States of Unknown. This button could work for Use Case 1 as well.
      • Mark F. has concerns about edge cases in the UI.
  • Option 2:
    • The TTA member tells the SRP Member to declare their conflicts and certify.
    • TTA Member goes into the Conflict Declaration UI and changes one (or more) Conflicts states as needed. TTA Member hits Certify, which is successful.
    •  Proposed Consequences:
      • ISRs either become available or unavailable as necessary for the SRP Member.
      • ISRs that are now Conflict State of Conflict that had Review Types other than None should automatically have Review Types changed to None.
    • Implementation Details:
      • A TTA member can certify as many times as necessary. Certify is a bulk action.
      • A SRP Member only can see the Conflict Declaration UI if they are Uncertified. TTA members can always see the Conflict Declaration UI.
      • Conflict State transitions are Role specific:
        • Valid Conflict State transitions for a TTA Member:
          • Available → Available
          • Available → Conflict
          • Conflict → Available
          • Conflict → Conflict
          • AutoConflict → Available
        • Valid Conflict State transitions for SRP Member:
          • Unknown → Available
          • Unknown → Conflict
  • Concerns:
    • What happens if the Review States are Finalized?
    • What happens if an external ISR is added after the main panel's ISRs are Finalized?
    • Should the system prevent changes to Conflict State based on Review State?

Open Actions:

DescriptionDue dateAssigneeTask appears on
2024-06-28 TTA Requirements Meeting
  • Jeff Kern Discuss with ADs the role of the new tools vs existing PHT.
Jeff Kern2023-04-28 TTA Requirements Meeting
  • Discussion on F2F parking lot items
2022-09-02 TTA Requirements Meeting
  • Establish who is Telescope Subsystem Scientist for GBT & VLBA.
2021-12-17 TTA Requirements Meeting

  • No labels