- Date: //date
- Time: 9:00 ET
- Location: nraozoom04
- Sprint Calendar
Agenda:
- Deciding on a solution for how to handle SRP Chairs assigning Review Types to conflicted or unknown reviewers.
Jira server DMS JIRA columnIds issuekey,summary,issuetype,created,updated,duedate,assignee,reporter,priority,status,resolution columns key,summary,type,created,updated,due,assignee,reporter,priority,status,resolution serverId eb2e750b-a83a-387e-8345-36eee8a98f01 key STT-1203 - Requirements for Conflict Management for TAC Members/ TAC Chair?
- (Obviously) show the conflicted proposals in the list but what visibility should they have into SRP comments, TAC comments, OSDs, etc
- Should TAC Chair have full visibility regardless of conflicts?
- TAC members have full visibility.
- Added Add more high level user stories for Preliminary Allocation Dispositions (PPR & OSR) and TAC meeting
- review high level narrative and user stories for v0.3 for consensus Mark Ferguson Jeff Kern Dana Balser
Open Actions:
Task report | ||
---|---|---|
|