Versions Compared

Key

  • This line was added.
  • This line was removed.
  • Formatting was changed.

...

  1. Recreate na-arc-3 so it gets the same performance as other na-arc-* nodes which is apparently at least 10Gb/s. (pmurphy)
    1. cloned na-arc-2 and moved the clone to naasc-vs-3 (zbutcher)
    2. moved old na-arc-3 to na-arc-3-OLD (thalstea)
    3. Renamed the clone to na-arc-3.  We connected it to the swarm successfully, but it had a low connection speed.
    4. Changed the model of  na-arc-3's vnet5 interface on naasc-vs-3 from rtl8139 to virtio to match all the other na-arc-* nodes.  Performance was still poor.
    5. Changed the MTU of na-arc-3 eth0 to 1500.  This is different than all the other na-arc-* nodes but it was either that or change the p5p1.120 and br97 on naasc-vs-3 from 9000 to 1500 which my have impacted other VM guests on that host.  Performance was now reasonable.  7Gb/s.  I was expecting about 9Gb/s but perhaps the 1500 MTU is affecting performance.
    6. Joined na-arc-3 to the swarm and started services (sbooth)
  2.  Launch Launch services on production swarm (sbooth)
  3. Test the production docker swarm with a test web interface. (lsharp)
  4. ask other ARC if they use MTU 9000 on 10Gb. (krowe)
  5. Switch the production docker swarm back to MTU 1500 since the test docker swarm uses MTU 1500 and is performing better.
  6. Fix natest-arc-3 so it's NIC Model is virtio instead of rtl8139
  7. Upgrade production swarm to meet ALMA requirements (16-core, 32GB)

...