...
- SRDP-501 Clarify as discussed in the Jira Ticket.
- SRDP-519 & SRDP-540: Clarify Standard and nonstandard processing in the Document as discussed on the ticket.
- SRDP-489: Clarify in the document that the DDT case this is internal software view, but the "User View" will consist of a single screen for entry of information from all phases.
- SRDP-480 Re-evaluate granularity of the assignment of proposals to super TAC process, Clarify the language and perhaps structure regarding reviews and approvals currently defined as Super TACs (especially as relates to HSA)
- SRDP-440 Update System Description to reflect the requirement in the System Concept to capture to database approved Allocation Requests and Allocation Dispositions as well as the metrics to track these items
- SRDP-495 The particular items to be edited should be done in the OPT, add comment to ticket and close
- SRDP-494 Evaluate the suggested change for impact to schedule and incorporate if feasible494 Initial phase of project builder tool should include at minimum: Authors, Sources, Hours Allocation, Configuration and Priority. (For VLA). Do analysis of if this costs time or if we can include it.
- SRDP-538 Incorporate language in System Description to better describe the functional operation of the ACL
- Add this as a risk also
...
- SRDP-523, SRDP-524 & SRDP-469 incorporate suggested solutions from the slide deck and move to Post Review Action
- Additional discussion on test - Committee has concern the projected validation effort is light. Jeff provided a detailed SS reflecting effort estimates. CLI will facilitate subsequent regression testing as test scripts evolve. Brian suggested including a recommendation in the report
- Action - Alan to include recommendation in report
- Action - Project to articulate and record this as a Risk
- Action - Project to document a plan to monitor effort as project progresses and revise estimates
...
- Seven issues remained "In Review" at the time of the meeting, all submitted by Rachel. A quick pass over the list resulted in probably all responses are sufficient. These will be transitioned to Closed or Post Action Review as appropriate for current state of ticket. Rachel will review and respond if anything needs further attention
- Committee has concerns with Funding Model as described and prioritization of resources