Versions Compared

Key

  • This line was added.
  • This line was removed.
  • Formatting was changed.

...

  •  SRDP-522  Add to risk register the insufficient details of the review variants at this stage, potential for cross talk and confusion in process details  that may be outside of current architecture Updated, marked done
  •   SRDP-496 & 475 clarify diagrams taking the technical nature of notation, generalize the diagram, and add a legend where needed  Added comment to both tickets, Assigned to Jeff as Post Review Action
  •   SRDP-493 clarify need for filtering and flexible project creation in System Description document, perhaps capture nature of observations at submission (DDT, RSRO, etc.) Added comment to ticket, assigned to Dana for Post Review Action
    • Add risk that we have not missed any other parts of the process  Updated Risk Register, see comment in ticket
  •  SRDP-532 Done, solution discussed in meeting accepted - Closed

...

  •  SRDP-461&531 Clarify requirement

...

  • , compile a quantified list of things people like about the ALMA OT and what they don't like about the PST.  Mine Science Helpdesk tickets to identify what is tripping people up about the PST.
    Added above comment to ticket, assigned to Jeff as Post Review Action
  •  SRDP-515 Add discussion of what needs to be captured to allocate subarrays to System Description under capabilities, perhaps also in Sec 2 Added comments to ticket, assigned to Dana as Post Action Review
    • Also add discussion on the ability for observers to request commensal systems to be on/off, does PI get to request data from commensal system?

REVIEWS

  • SRDP-522 Also discussed under OVERVIEW, no additional action from this discussion
  • SRDP-507 Clarify the wording that the tool does not automatically assign reviewers, Dana to update ticket, Alan to review  and close
  • SRDP-537 & 541 Point to current guidelines as the policy for defining conflicts

...