Versions Compared

Key

  • This line was added.
  • This line was removed.
  • Formatting was changed.

...

Comparing CASA-5 and CASA-6 (casa-pipeline-validation-8) across the two different CPUs available for batch processing in NM and CV shows that the newer CPUs (E5-2640v3) run a small calibration job (6.7GB) about 1.25 times faster than the old CPUs (E5-2670) with CASA-6 performing slower in every case.  There was no significant run-time difference between NM and CV for similar hardware and software.  Units Results are in minutes.

Full, serial pipeline with small dataset

RHEL7 - 6.7GB dataset with NM Lustre-2.5.5 (units results are in minutes)

CASAnmpost051 (E5-2640v3)cvpost020 (E5-2640v3)nmpost038 (E5-2670)cvpost003 (E5-2670)
5114, 117110, 111144, 143140, 141
6156*, 164*156*, 158*200*, 201*197*, 199*

...

RHEL7 - 6.7GB dataset after NM upgrade Lustre-2.10.8 and CV results copied from last test (units results are in minutes)

...

RHEL7 - 350GB dataset with NM Lustre-2.5.5 (units results are in minutes)

...

RHEL7 - 350GB dataset with NM Lustre-2.10.8 (units results are in minutes)

...

RHEL6 - with NM Lustre-2.5.5 (units results are in minutes)

RHEL7 - with NM Lustre-2.5.5 (units results are in minutes)

...

RHEL7 - with NM Lustre-2.10.x,CASA-pipeline-5.6.3-9 and CASA 6.0.0.23a100.dev17 (units results are in minutes)