...
| Version | Goal | Packages | Notes | Draft Components Hit |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| implement simulating review process and establish testing interface | Review | Enough to carry Proposal Reviews into Allocate phase | ||
| establish prototype UI and make hand offs of entities between packages | Allocate; Approve | For TAC Prep subphase, assume no changes to ADS:OSDs and do not build ATM. Use random fill of information in Allocation Disposition entity to hand off to TAC UI. Versioning of ATM and ADS to support modification in TAC subphase and Approve phase. | A1 A1.1 A5 A5.1, A5.2 A6 A6.6 A7 A7.1, A7.3, A7.5 A8 A8.1 A9 A10 A10.1 A11 A11.4 | |
| implement building of ATM and improve its UI in scheduler tools | Allocate | Focus highest priority features first; build in complexity over release | A1, A2, A3, A4, A5, A6, A7, A8 | |
| implement Facility Reports, Proposal Summary, and Directors' Report | Allocate; Approve | preliminary reporting pass | A9 | |
| implement manual modification and display of ADS:ODS in scheduler tools | Allocate; Approve | includes changing details of OSDs and Scheduling Priorities | A6, A7, A10, A11 | |
| develop and connect algorithms for assignment of Preliminary Scheduling Priorities and Source Conflict Identification; improvements to UI | Allocate | e.g., connect to Prioritizer | A5, A8 | |
| improve ATM construction, UI, and reporting | Allocate; Approve | A1, A2, A3, A4, A5, A6, A7, A8, A9, A10, A11 | ||
| implement OSR Allocate and Approve phases | Allocate; Approve | B1, B2 | ||
| implement simulating Allocate and Approve phases | Allocate; Approve | |||
...
| Expand | |||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| |||||||||||||||
|
Story board for OSR
| B1 | Recommend Scheduling Priorities | |
|---|---|---|
| B2 | Approve Scheduling Priorities |
As a TTA member for the OSR process, one or more of us will collaborate on reviewing a proposal. Typically for proposals in the OSR process, we don't modify the requests to the extent as in the PPR process: we either accept what they have proposed or decline it. It would be good to have the same tools to edit OSDs as the PPR process, but I won't define ATMs and build reports because this is just one proposal. I will have external information to understand the available time and if this proposal can be accommodated. After modifying OSDs, as a TTA member I perform the Science and Feasibility reviews as well as form the recommendations for Proprietary Time, Approved Time, Scheduling Constraints, and Scheduling Priorities. I need to modify these attributes and provide OSC Comments to the PI and Internal Comments for the OSC in case I want to capture any specific comments for the PI. Once I have made my recommendations, I want to finalize the review.
...