Versions Compared

Key

  • This line was added.
  • This line was removed.
  • Formatting was changed.

Agenda:

  • Confirm Conflict Certification (SRP Member action and TTA Group member powers;
    Jira
    showSummaryfalse
    serverDMS JIRA
    columnIdsissuekey,summary,issuetype,created,updated,duedate,assignee,reporter,priority,status,resolution
    columnskey,summary,type,created,updated,due,assignee,reporter,priority,status,resolution
    serverIdeb2e750b-a83a-387e-8345-36eee8a98f01
    keySTT-1146
    )
    • For a SRP member, they would not have a “save” option on conflict certification. They can only certify or the changes do not persist.


    • A TTA member should be able to change a conflict designation at any time. We do not need the software to manage if it is the result of the auto conflict process or a user specified conflict, as we trust the TTA member.

    • A TTA member should be able to certify a user's conflict status, if necessary.
  • Mark F -
  • Allie -
  • From Backlog 1/23/23
    • Confirmed removing "Closed" as a Review State in favor of just deleting the ISR.
    • Confirmed removing "None" as a Review Type
    • ISRs are created upon the assignment of a Review Type (Primary, Secondary, Tertiary)
    • If the Review Type is unassigned, then the ISR is deleted.
    • A SRP Chair or TTA member has the ability to change the Review Type.
      • If the Review State is not blank, then a warning is given saying that data (ISR) will be deleted
      • If the Review State is Finalized, then the Review Type cannot be changed by either TTA or SRP Chair.
  • Discussion on stories in Sprint 47
    • As written, are these capturing where (e.g., FE/BE) and what (e.g., requirements) the work currently is?

Open Actions:

Task report
pages68321335